Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Howard v. Calhoun County et al
as 1:2017cv00537
Plaintiff:
Simeon Paul Howard
Defendant:
Calhoun County and Calhoun County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Calhoun County Jail
as 1:2017cv00497
Plaintiff:
Lesley Synatra Tucker
Defendant:
Calhoun County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gann v. Calhoun County Jail Admin et al
as 1:2016cv00416
Plaintiff:
Bradford Thomas Gann
Defendant:
Calhoun County Jail Admin, Larry Amerson, BB Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Impson v. Amerson et al
as 1:2016cv00323
Plaintiff:
Jerry Fred Impson, Jr.
Defendant:
Larry Amerson, Matthew Wade, John Garlick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arhebamen v. Bice et al
as 2:2012cv11627
Petitioner:
Mark Arhebamen
Respondent:
Bice, St. Clair County Jail and Calhoun County Jail
Johnson v. Calhoun County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2012cv00760
Plaintiff:
Rico Vantino Johnson
Defendant:
Calhoun County Sheriff's Department, Calhoun County Jail and Larry Amerson
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Amerson et al
as 1:2012cv00508
Plaintiff:
Tyron Lee Thomas
Defendant:
Larry Amerson, Calhoun County Sheriff's Office and Calhoun County Jail
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendricks v. Calhoun County Jail et al
as 1:2012cv00242
Plaintiff:
Jason Wayne Hendricks
Defendant:
Calhoun County Jail and Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClullun v. Amerson et al
as 1:2011cv04185
Plaintiff:
Michael McClullun
Defendant:
Larry Amerson, Calhoun County Sheriff's Department and Calhoun County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Amerson et al
as 1:2011cv04112
Plaintiff:
Steve Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
Larry Amerson, Michael D Hilley, Calhoun County Sheriff's Department and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
