Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jackie Saldana, et al v. Glenhaven Healthcare LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-56194
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARIA SALDANA, as individuals and as successors and heirs to Ricardo Saldana, deceased, JACKIE SALDANA, RICARDO SALDANA, Jr. and others
Defendant / Appellant: CARAVAN OPERATIONS CORP., a California corporation, BENJAMIN KARP, an individual, MATTHEW KARP, an individual and others
Amicus Curiae: CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH FACILITIES, AMERICAN HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION, JUSTICE IN AGING and others
Anderson et al v. Dooley
as 4:2015cv05120
Plaintiff: Bruce Anderson, John Wilson, Robert Austin and others
Defendant: Diana Dooley and Mark Ghaly
Not Classified By Court: Governor Gavin Newsom
Petitioner: United States of America
Amicus Curiae: California Association of Health Facilities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valley View Health Care, Inc., et al v. Ronald Chapman, et al
as 14-15316
Plaintiff - Appellee: VALLEY VIEW HEALTH CARE, INC., DBA Riverbank Nursing Center, STONEBROOK CONVALESCENT CENTER, DBA Stonebrook Healthcare Center, LIFEHOUSE PARKVIEW OPERATIONS, LLC, DBA Parkview Healthcare Center and others
Defendant - Appellant: RONALD CHAPMAN, M.D., Director of the California Department of Public Health and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Valley View Health Care, Inc., dba Riverbank Nursing Center et al v. Ronald Chapman, M.D., Director of the California Department of Public Health et al
as 1:2013at00006
Plaintiff: Valley View Health Care, Inc., dba Riverbank Nursing Center , The Stonebrook Convalescent Center dba Stonebrook Healthcare Center , Lifehouse Parkview Operations, LLC dba Parkview Healthcare Center and others
Defendant: Ronald Chapman, M.D., Director of the California Department of Public Health, California Department of Public Health and The State of California
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Valley View Health Care, Inc., et al v. Chapman, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00036
Plaintiff: Valley View Health Care, Inc. , Stonebrook Convalescent Center , Lifehouse Parkview Operations, LLC and others
Defendant: Ronald Chapman and California Department of Public Health
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
California Association of Heal v. David Maxwell-Jolly
as 11-55852
Plaintiff - Appellee: CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH FACILITIES
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID MAXWELL-JOLLY, Director of the Department of Health Care Services, State of California
California Association of Health Facilities v. David Maxwell-Jolly We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv03259
Plaintiff: California Association of Health Facilities
Defendant: David Maxwell-Jolly
Crane et al v. Shewry et al
as 2:2007at00745
Plaintiff: Chandra Crane, Gladys Heusdens, Duke Facilities, Inc. and others
Defendant: Sandra Shewry and John Chiang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crane et al v. Shewry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01639
Plaintiff: Chandra Crane, Gladys Heusdens, Duke Facilities, Inc. and others
Defendant: Sandra Shewry and John Chiang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AFL-CIO & CA Labor, et al v. Chamber of Commerce, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 03-55166
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES, CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, EMPLOYERS GROUP and others
Defendant: BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, FRANK G. VANACORE, as the Chief of the Audit Review and Analysis Section of the California Department of Health Services and others
Amicus Curiae: LPA, INC. & ASSOCIATED BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS, INC. and NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?