Cases 11 - 15 of 15
California State Automobile Association, Inter-Insurance Bureau v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 4:2008cv01633
Plaintiff:
California State Automobile Association, Inter-Insurance Bureau and California State Automobile Association, Inter-Insurance Bureau
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
California State Automobile Association, Inter-Insurance Bureau v. Franke, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01642
Plaintiff:
California State Automobile Association, Inter-Insurance Bureau and California State Automobile Association, Inter-Insurance Bureau
Defendant:
Franke, Inc. and John Guest USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lee v. Fitt et al
as 2:2007cv05408
Plaintiff:
Gloria Lee and Gloria Lee
Defendant:
Robin Fitt and California State Automobile Association Inter-Insurance Bureau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
O'Hartz v. California State Automobile Association Inter-Insurance Bureau Group Long Term Disability Plan
as 3:2007cv00415
Plaintiff:
Susan O'Hartz
Defendant:
California State Automobile Association Inter-Insurance Bureau Group Long Term Disability Plan and California State Automobile Association Inter-Insurance Bureau Group Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Diamond Triumph Auto v. Safelite Glass Corp.
as 3:2002cv00514
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Diamond Triumphn Auto Glass, Inc.
Defendant:
Safelite Group, Inc., f/k/a Safelite Class Corporation; Safelite Solutions, LLC., f/k/a Safelite Glass Corporation, and Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., f/k/a Safelite Glass Corporation and State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company
Amicus Curiae:
Cody H. Brooks
Intervenor:
United States Automobile Association, Beacon Insurance Company, Premier Insurance Company of MA and others
Counter Plaintiff:
Safelite Glass Corp.
Not Yet Classified:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
