Cases 41 - 50 of 104
Tillery v. Calloway et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Billy Frank Tillery, Jr.
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, State of Alabama and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tillery v. Calloway et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Billy Frank Tillery, Jr.
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Echols v. Moncrief et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Schyler Lee Echols
Defendant:
Mrs. Moncrief, Rolanda Calloway and Capt. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crandle v. Calloway et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00574
Plaintiff:
James Olester Crandle
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Ms. Monton and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Business Office Clerk et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00446
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway and Business Office Clerk
Plaintiff:
Brandon Howard and Brandon Christopher Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ganey v. Smith et al
as 6:2021cv00653
Plaintiff:
Alex Jon Ganey
Defendant:
Brookwood Baptist Jasper, Richard Calloway and Nick Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Smith et al
as 6:2021cv00454
Defendant:
Richard Calloway and Nick Smith
Plaintiff:
Hollis Chadwick Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calloway v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 5:2021cv00181
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman
Petitioner:
Sandra Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cargill v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Capt. Hudson, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Leigh Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Calloway et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00052
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Officer Landrum, Capt. Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Edward Miller, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
