Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Matthew Calio v. Camden County Board of Chosen Freeholders
as 22-2261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW CALIO
Defendant / Appellee:
CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, doing business as CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
CALIO v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2019cv08393
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CALIO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GREEN et al v. DASMASH TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv05142
Plaintiff:
SHARI GREEN and TASHERIAH WINSTEAD
Defendant:
DASMASH TRANSPORTATION, INC. , CAMDEN COUNTY YELLOW CAB CO., INC. , WOODLYNNE PETRO, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MUNS v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES
as 1:2017cv00587
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH MUNS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Castleberry v. Camden County
as 2:2016cv00128
Plaintiff:
Robert Castleberry
Defendant:
Camden County
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA of 1993)
RODGERS v. CSMI, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv02746
Plaintiff:
SHARON RODGERS
Defendant:
CSMI, LLC and CAMDEN COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
RADLINGER v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2012cv06862
Plaintiff:
WALTER RADLINGER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY and CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
BONILLA v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE CAMDEN COUNTY, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv04370
Plaintiff:
NORA BONILLA
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE CAMDEN COUNTY, LLC , FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
D.C.H. et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2012cv00066
Plaintiff:
D.C.H. , Joseph C. Hayes and Gayl Hayes
Defendant:
Carlos G. Jones, Jr. and Camden County School District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
