Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Amspec, LLC v. Camin Cargo Control, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Amspec, LLC
Defendant:
Camin Cargo Control, Inc., Craig Rodrigue, Nicholas McClendon and others
AmSpec, LLC v. Calhoun et al
as 4:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
AmSpec, LLC
Defendant:
Richard Calhoun, Dung Hoang, Carl Crawford and others
Harris v. Camin Cargo Control, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Leo Harris
Defendant:
Camin Cargo Control, Inc. and Camin Cargo Control
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
CAMIN CARGO CONTROL, INC. v. AMSPEC, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv12634
Defendant:
IVAN ORTIZ and AMSPEC, LLC
Plaintiff:
CAMIN CARGO CONTROL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guillory v. Citgo Petroleum Corp et al
as 2:2014cv02982
Plaintiff:
Bradley Guillory
Defendant:
Citgo Petroleum Corp and Camin Cargo Control Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monceaux et al v. Camin Cargo Control, Inc.
as 4:2014cv02884
Plaintiff:
Clifton Monceaux , Alejandro Garcia-Sanchez , Eric Whitney and others
Defendant:
Camin Cargo Control, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hanson et al v. Camin Cargo Control, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00027
Plaintiff:
James R Hanson , Ronald Jones and Luis E Fernandez
Defendant:
Camin Cargo Control, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
GUEVARA v. CAMIN CARGO CONTROL, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv02461
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON GUEVARA
Defendant:
CAMIN CARGO CONTROL, INC., CARLOS CAMIN, CLAUDIO CAMIN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JAMES v. CAMIN CARGO CONTROL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv06128
Plaintiff:
IVO JAMES
Defendant:
CAMIN CARGO CONTROL, INC., CARLOS CAMIN, CLAUDIO CAMIN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hart v. Camin Cargo Control, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01171
Plaintiff:
John Hart and Aaron Michon
Defendant:
CAMIN CARGO CONTROL, INC. and Carlos Camin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
