Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Steve Herrick, J.D. Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Medical Unit et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Campbell
Defendant:
Medical Unit, Officer Freeman and Sgt Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Richmond City Justice Center et al
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Campbell
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center, Officer Tylor and Officer Mertaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Robert John Campbell
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Desper v. Sanders et al
as 1:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Jamie Paul Desper
Defendant:
S. Sanders, K. Cosby, A. Eure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitfield v. Artis et al
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
David M. Whitfield
Defendant:
Sgt Artis, Ches. Jail Medical Staff, Sgt Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Jones
as 7:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Cindy Campbell
Defendant:
Lt. C. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Campbell County Commonwealth Attorney's Office
as 7:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Andre Lamont Andrews
Defendant:
Campbell County Commonwealth Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Moses V. Campbell, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold Clarke and Dove Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Rappahanock Regional Jail
as 1:2022cv01376
Plaintiff:
James Cody Campbell
Defendant:
Rappahanock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
