Cases 1 - 10 of 150
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC v. Beattie et al
as 0:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC doing business as Running Aces
Defendant:
Michael Beattie, Craig Beaulieu, Raymond Brenny and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Campbell et al v. Schroeder et al
as 0:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Venedia Larita Campbell and Martin Alan Smith, II
Defendant:
Andrew William Schroeder, Kyle Allen Williams, Paul Franz Albers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Amanda Campbell
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Campbell v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
William Campbell
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Awaijane et al v. Bittell et al
as 0:2023cv02892
Plaintiff:
Assad Awaijane, Robert Awaijane, Anisse Campbell and others
Defendant:
Andrew Bittell, Michael Osbeck, Jr., Christopher Cushenbery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell et al v. Accell Companies, Inc.
as 0:2023cv02601
Plaintiff:
Rodney Campbell, Sr. and Jonathan Durbin
Defendant:
Accell Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207 fl FLSA: Maximum Hours
Campbell v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 0:2023cv02508
Plaintiff:
David Campbell
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Klapp et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Adam Klapp, Charles Kinnard, Darrius Pearson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Tanton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
William Tanton, Mark Bailey, Andrew Ito and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Nygard v. Orono, City of et al
as 0:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Jay Thomas Nygard
Defendant:
Orono, City of, Dennis Sabourin Walsh, Correy Farniok and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
