Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Gonzalez v. Avinger, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv03401
Plaintiff:
Billy Gonzalez
Defendant:
Avinger, Inc. , Jeffrey M. Soinski , Matthew B. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Shafik v. Nanthealth, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01940
Defendant:
Michael Blaszyk, Mark Burnett, Kirk K. Calhoun and others
Plaintiff:
John Shafik
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01825
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rolland v. ReWalk Robotics, Ltd. et al
as CAN/4:17-cv-00362
Plaintiff:
Donald Rolland
Defendant:
ReWalk Robotics, Ltd. , Larry Jasinski , Ami Kraft and others
Deng et al v. ReWalk Robotics Ltd. et al
as MA/1:17-cv-10169
Defendant:
ReWalk Robotics, Ltd. , Larry Jasinski , Ami Kraft and others
Plaintiff:
Qian Deng , David Hershlikovitz , Jackie888, Inc. and others
Movant:
Wang Yan
Deng et al v. ReWalk Robotics Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv10169
Defendant:
ReWalk Robotics Ltd., Larry Jasinski, Ami Kraft and others
Plaintiff:
Qian Deng , David Hershlikovitz , Jackie888, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Rolland v. ReWalk Robotics, Ltd. et al
as 3:2017cv00362
Plaintiff:
Donald Rolland
Defendant:
ReWalk Robotics, Ltd., Larry Jasinski, Ami Kraft and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Christians v. KemPharm, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00002
Defendant:
KemPharm, Inc. , Travis C. Mickle , Gordon K Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Christians
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. et al v. Canaccord Genuity Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv08298
Plaintiff:
Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. and Energy Intelligence Group (UK) Limited
Defendant:
Canaccord Genuity Inc. and Canaccord Genuity Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bodine v. Canaccord Genuity Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03019
Plaintiff:
Bradford Bodine
Defendant:
Canaccord Genuity Inc. and Daniel Daviau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
