Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Norris Pegues v. Karl Hoffman, et al
as 24-1366
Plaintiff:
NORRIS E. PEGUES
Defendant:
KARL HOFFMAN, Doctor, LYNN DOBBERT and CANDACE WARNER
Tyrone Ellis v. Sharonda Long, et al
as 22-2373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tyrone Ellis
Defendant / Appellee:
Sharonda Long, Advanced Practice Nurse (APN), Nannette Vowell, Thomas Daniel and others
Defendant:
APN John and Jane Doe
James Breyley, III v. Larry Fuchs, et al
as 22-1663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES K. BREYLEY, III
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY FUCHS, DON STRAHOTA, Warden, CANDACE WARNER and others
Ellis v. Long et al
as 6:2020cv06060
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ellis
Defendant:
Dr. John Doe, Sharonda Long, Dr. Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Breyley, James v. Darden, Herbert et al
as 3:2020cv00006
Plaintiff:
James Kendall Breyley, III
Defendant:
Don Strahota, Candace Warner, Herbert Darden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony J. Machicote v. Doctor Roethlisberger, et al
as 19-3009
Defendant / Appellee:
KIM STECKER, Nurse, PRAPTI KUBER, M.D., CANDACE WARNER, Health Services Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY J. MACHICOTE
Robinson, Nathaniel v. Warner, Candace et al
as 3:2019cv00604
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Robinson
Defendant:
Rosylaind Huneke, Chris Endreas and Candace Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Blake v. Candace Warner, et al
as 18-2620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. BLAKE
Defendant - Appellee:
CANDACE WARNER, TONI JOHNSON and ANGELA STETTER
Hogan, Philip et al v. Syed, Salam et al
as 3:2018cv00350
Plaintiff:
Philip C. Hogan
Defendant:
Salam Syed , Phillip Hoechst, Candace Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Machicote, Anthony v. Warner, Candace et al
as 3:2018cv00249
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jason Machicote
Defendant:
Candace Warner , Kim Stecker, Dr. Rothlesberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
