Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Angel Canto v. City of Santa Ana et al
as 8:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Angel Canto
Defendant:
City of Santa Ana and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
(PC) Maldonado v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Shanee Maldonado
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Joe A. Lazarraga, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canto-Galves v. Garland
as 22-1307
Petitioner:
DOMINGO ANDRES CANTO-GALVES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ana C. Canto v. Andrew M. Saul
as 2:2021cv04908
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soci Andrew Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Ana C. Canto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Riaz v. Henry et al
as 1:2021cv00911
Defendant:
City of Visalia, County of Tulare, Edvin Canto and others
Plaintiff:
Samreen Riaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Smith v. Kristopher Cambpell, et al
as 21-15831
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDRES CANTO, Correctional Sergeant, E. MARTINEZ, Correctional Officer, KRISTOPHER CAMBPELL, Correctional Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Martinez aka Daniel Rodriguez (true name) #1068838 v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2021cv00098
Plaintiff:
James Martinez and Daniel Rodriguez (true name)
Defendant:
County of Washoe, State of Nevada, Figuroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paradise IP LLC v. Canto Software, Inc.
as 4:2020cv07656
Defendant:
Canto Software, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Paradise IP LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Domingo Canto-Galves v. William Barr
as 20-72385
Petitioner:
DOMINGO ANDRES CANTO-GALVES, AKA Domingo Canta-Galves
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC v. Canto Software, Inc.
as 3:2020cv02831
Defendant:
Canto Software, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
