Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Buckner v. City of New York et al
as 3:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Shatasia C. Buckner
Defendant:
City of New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Ashley Borough Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DANIELS et al v. MARLEIHIA HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv03867
Plaintiff:
DANEE SLAYTON, KELVIN DANIELS, UMIR IDRIS and others
Defendant:
MARLEIHIA HARPER, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICE, NICOLE MACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CANTY et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv01873
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL R. CANTY, LASHAWN V. BRADWELL-CANTY and PRINCESTON L. CANTY KENT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JONATHAN HOULAN, DHS REP LANERTIA FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aiken-Canty v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv00909
Plaintiff:
Latisha Aiken-Canty
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CANTY v. PHILADELPHIA CORPORATION FOR AGING et al
as 2:2016cv00520
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN CANTY
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA CORPORATION FOR AGING and PHILADELPHIA INSURANCE COMPANIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANNUM v. CANTY
as 2:2015cv02996
Plaintiff:
STACY M. HANNUM
Defendant:
BRANDON K. CANTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CANTY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv00469
Petitioner:
GREGORY CANTY
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Canty v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2015cv00064
Plaintiff:
Anthony Canty
Defendant:
David J. Ebbert, J. L. Thomas and Donna Zickefoose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CANTY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2014cv07194
Plaintiff:
GREGORY CANTY
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, M. FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canty v. Ebbert
as 1:2014cv02015
Petitioner:
Anthony Canty
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
