Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Thibodeaux v. Capital Management Services Group, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00061
Plaintiff: Debra M. Thibodeaux
Defendant: Capital Management Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05678
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00887
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Christina Avalos v. Capital Management Services Group, Inc.
as 2:2010cv02616
Plaintiff: Christina Avalos
Defendant: Capital Management Services Group, Inc.
Rutherford v. Capital Management Services Group, Inc.
as 3:2008cv05758
Plaintiff: Lisa Rutherford
Defendant: Capital Management Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Unger v. Capital Management Services Group, Inc.
as 4:2008cv02918
Plaintiff: Kristen Unger
Defendant: Capital Management Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02032
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McDowell v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv04053
Plaintiff: Shawn McDowell, Shawn McDowell and Shawn McDowell
Defendant: Arrow Financial Services, LLC and Capital Management Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03998
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tong et al v. Bidna & Keys a Professional Law
as 5:2007cv01025
Plaintiff: Kinh Siau Tong and Ann Tong
Defendant: Bidna & Keys a Professional Law and Capital Management Services Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?