Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Joplin v. Capstone Real Estate Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Pamela Kay Joplin
Defendant:
Capstone Real Estate Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Soto v. KCAP RE Fund III, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02079
Plaintiff:
Ramon Luis Soto
Defendant:
KCAP RE Fund III, LLC, KCAP Emerald Ridge, LLC, Capstone Real Estate Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv03624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Wallace v. Capstone Real Estate Services, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
Sandra Diane Wallace
Defendant:
Capstone Real Estate Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Grand Hill Investments LLC v. Capstone Real Estate Services Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00153
Plaintiff:
Grand Hill Investments LLC
Defendant:
Capstone Real Estate Services Inc and Renovation Services in TX LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rodriguez et al v. Capstone Real Estate Services, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00315
Plaintiff:
Felipe Rodriguez and Edilberto Carrizales
Defendant:
Capstone Real Estate Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodriguez et al v. Capstone Real Estate Services, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00318
Plaintiff:
Felipe Rodriguez and Edilberto Carrizales
Defendant:
Capstone Real Estate Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodriguez v. Carrizales et al
as 3:2012cv00314
Plaintiff:
Felipe Rodriguez
Defendant:
Edilberto Carrizales and Capstone Real Estate Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
