Cases 111 - 120 of 164
Hill v. Leu et al
as 7:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Leu, United States Penitentiary Lee and Captain Shortt
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Neal v. Leu et al
as 7:2020cv00069
Defendant:
Leu, Captain Shortt and United States Penitentiary Lee
Plaintiff:
Denard Darnell Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. Leu et al
as 7:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Leu, United States Penitentiary Lee and Captain Shortt
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Leu et al
as 7:2020cv00078
Defendant:
Leu, United States Penitentiary Lee and Captain Shortt
Plaintiff:
Henry Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mendez et al v. Leu et al
as 7:2020cv00046
Plaintiff:
Michael Suarez, Luis A. Ramos, Keith Adams and others
Defendant:
Captain Shortt, United States Penitentiary Lee and Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cecil v. New River Valley Regional Jail Authority et al
as 7:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Librarian Jane or John Doe, Captain Keith Fleeman, New River Valley Regional Jail Authority and others
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cecil v. New River Valley Regional Jail et al
as 7:2020cv00004
Defendant:
Captain Fleeman, New River Valley Regional Jail, Gregory Winston and others
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mabe v. Mediko et al
as 7:2019cv00860
Defendant:
Zack Grizzel, Major Parks, Stuart Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Jared D. Mabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elswick v. Stanley et al
as 7:2019cv00815
Plaintiff:
Joseph Seth Houchins Elswick
Defendant:
Major J.R. Stanley, Captain K. Ulrich and Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority Tazwelle Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Trent
as 7:2019cv00713
Defendant:
Mrs. Wheeler, Captain Hodges, Major Enoch and others
Plaintiff:
Josey Ray Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
