Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Sweeting v. Riddick, et al
as 2:2015cv00313
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sweeting
Defendant:
Captain Riddick, Lt. Jackson, Sgt. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cosby v. Arl. Cnty. Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2015cv00182
Plaintiff:
Attila Euripides Cosby
Defendant:
Arl. Cnty. Sheriff Dept., Deputy Glover, Sergeant Lindsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Newcome et al
as 2:2014cv00501
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Rice
Defendant:
Jeffery Newcome, Captain Mack #8 and Cpl. Jail. Jones #231
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gholson v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2012cv00584
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Lonnie McDonovan Gholson, Jimmy Gilmore and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie McDonovan Gholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Power et al
as 2:2012cv00377
Plaintiff:
Joe Edwards
Defendant:
Mr. Captain Power, Ms. Lacks and Captain Sawyers Power
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Dolan et al
as 2:2012cv00209
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
Captain Dolan, R. Thompson, Grievance Coordinato Seay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolley v. Vargus et al
as 2:2012cv00126
Plaintiff:
Robert Gary Devaughan Tolley
Defendant:
L.T. Vargus, Sgt. Vargus, L.T. Struzzerri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Turner et al
as 1:2010cv00108
Plaintiff:
Tyree Lawson
Defendant:
Captain Turner, Captain Sudduth, Captain Hickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Irving et al
as 2:2008cv00497
Plaintiff:
Derrick Allen Martin
Defendant:
Antoinette Irving and Captain Garrison
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crosby v. Cushinberry et al
as 2:2008cv00366
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiztroy Crosby
Defendant:
Captain Cushinberry, Captain Robinson and Doctor Costello
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
