Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Nelson v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00855
Plaintiff:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Jones, Sandra Y. Giles, Robert Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dansby v. Babers, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00070
Plaintiff:
Andre Dansby
Defendant:
Captain Babers , Lt. Lockley , Timothy Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00287
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Jean Darbouze, Mrs. Wilson, Mrs. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Scott et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Stephanie Scott, Brian Mitchell, Mark Jankoski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Babers et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv01044
Plaintiff:
Willie James Barber
Defendant:
Captain Babers, CO I Rodgers, Sgt. Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Hetzel et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00855
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Benard Mosley
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Captain Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGhee v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00856
Plaintiff:
Antonio McGhee
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Captain Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams, et al v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00838
Plaintiff:
Willie Kevin Williams
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Captain Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrithers v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00549
Plaintiff:
John Richard Carrithers
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Gary Hetzel, Captain Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Boyd et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2011cv00360
Plaintiff:
DeMarquies Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Louis D. Boyd, Kenneth Sconyers, Captain Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
