Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00686
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Hardware Resources, Inc. v. Carbide Industries, LLC
as 5:2014cv00208
Plaintiff:
Hardware Resources, Inc.
Defendant:
Carbide Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BlueLinx Corporation v. Carbide Industries, LLC et al
as 5:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
BlueLinx Corporation
Defendant:
Carbide Industries, LLC , John Parrish and Pamela Parrish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEELCORE CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. v. LECEESE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00093
Cross Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., CARBIDE INDUSTRIES, LLC, KEN BUILDERS SUPPLY, INC. and others
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., CARBIDE INDUSTRIES, LLC, KEN BUILDERS SUPPLY, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant:
GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Third Party Plaintiff:
LECEESE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC, M & J STUCCO, LLC, NORANDEX BUILDING MATERIALS DISTRIBUTION, INC. and others
Counter Claimant:
LECEESE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC and M & J STUCCO, LLC
Cross Claimant:
M & J STUCCO, LLC
Counter Defendant:
STEELCORE CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. and STEELCORE CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.
Plaintiff:
STEELCORE CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wright et al v. Carbide Industries, LLC
as 3:2011cv00272
Plaintiff:
Adrian Wright , Mike Helmbrecht and Charles McKinney
Defendant:
Carbide Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pace Industry Union-Management Pension Fund and its Trustees v. Carbide Industries LLC
as 3:2011cv00010
Plaintiff:
Pace Industry Union-Management Pension Fund and its Trustees , Stan Johnson , Jon Geenen and others
Defendant:
Carbide Industries LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
