Cases 1 - 10 of 261
Actavis, Inc. et al v. King Drug Company of Florence, Inc. et al
as 1:2024mi00001
Respondent:
King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corp., Amerisourcebergen Drug Corp. and others
Petitioner:
Actavis, Inc., Actavis Holdco U.S., Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Winston County, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 6:2022cv01394
Plaintiff:
Winston County, Alabama
Defendant:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
The City of Bessemer, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00162
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc, Allergan PLC, Actavis Pharma Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Bessemer, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Alabaster, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00133
Defendant:
Allergan PLC, Par Pharmaceutical Companies Inc, West Ward Pharmaceutical Corp and others
Plaintiff:
City of Alabaster, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Irondale, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00134
Defendant:
Allergen PLC, Actavis Pharma, INC.,, Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of Irondale, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Sarasota v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 8:2018cv00859
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of Sarasota
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CITY OF NICEVILLE FLORIDA v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 3:2021cv00770
Defendant:
ALLERGAN FINANCE LLC, ALLERGAN PLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Niceville, Florida and CITY OF NICEVILLE FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
MEI Services, Inc. v. Cardinal Health 110, LLC
as 21-11477
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEI SERVICES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CARDINAL HEALTH 110, LLC
IN RE: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
as 1:2009md02084
Plaintiff:
George Steven Legrand, Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc., Maxi Drug, Inc. doing business as Brooks Pharmacy and others
Counter Defendant:
Meijer Inc and Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
In Re:
Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
Defendant:
Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Perrigo Company, Par Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Respondent:
King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., Miami-Luken, Inc., Prescription Supply, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Paddock Laboratories Inc
Petitioner:
AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp., Besins Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
City of Auburn, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00976
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Jassen Pharmaceutica, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Auburn, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
