Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Katz v. Bowlmor Times Square, LLC
as 1:2012cv05197
Plaintiff:
Yehuda Katz
Defendant:
Bowlmor Times Square, LLC, Cardtronics USA, Inc. and ATM Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Automated Transactions LLC v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Automated Transactions LLC
Defendant:
Cumberland Farms, Inc. and Cardtronics USA Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Cumberland Farms, Inc. and Cardtronics USA Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Automated Transactions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Fried v. Cardtronics USA, Inc.
as 3:2012cv02119
Defendant:
Cardtronics USA, Inc
Plaintiff:
Avrohom P. Fried
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Katz v. Eataly USA L.L.C. et al
as 3:2012cv02083
Plaintiff:
Yehudah Katz
Defendant:
Eataly USA L.L.C., Eataly NY L.L.C., UniCredit Group and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fried v. Cardtronics USA, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00625
Defendant:
Cardtronics USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Avrohom P. Fried
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sheryl Johnson v. Cardtronics USA, Inc., et al
as 12-56066
:
In re: CARDTRONICS ATM FEE NOTICE LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERYL JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CARDTRONICS USA, INC., CARDTRONICS, INC., DBA Cardtronics (Texas) Inc. and TARGET CORPORATION
Mabary v. Cardtronics USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv03056
Plaintiff:
Lisa Mabary
Defendant:
Cardtronics USA Inc and Cardtronics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norris v. Cardtronics USA, Inc.
as 3:2011cv02813
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Louise Norris
Defendant:
Cardtronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Mabary v. Cardtronics USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv02877
Plaintiff:
Lisa Mabary
Defendant:
Cardtronics USA Inc and Cardtronics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
