Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Wood Ranch Moorpark, Inc. et al v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00818
Defendant:
United Sugar Producers & Refiners Cooperative, ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Wood Ranch Moorpark, Inc., Wood Ranch Agoura LP, Wood Ranch Camarillo LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023at00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Luvianio v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation
as 2:2023at00471
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Luvianio
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
(PC) Gulbronson v. Schneider et al
as 2:2022cv01128
Plaintiff:
Eric Gulbronson and Eric Conrad Gulbronson
Defendant:
Denton Schneider, Mary A. Cargill and Joseph Bick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
