Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Barrett v. Rozmarynoski et al
as 2:2026cv01251
Plaintiff:
Carl Barrett
Defendant:
Tonia Doris Rozmarynoski, Christopher Stevens, Jodi Perttu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Rozmarynoski
as 2:2026cv00113
Plaintiff:
Carl Barrett
Defendant:
Tonia Doris Rozmarynoski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carl Barrett v. Montrel Bridges, et al
as 24-1411
Plaintiff:
CARL BARRETT
Defendant:
MONTREL BRIDGES, RACHEL MATUSHAK, JOSEPH SPENCER and others
Barrett v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC; et al
as 9:2022cv80540
Plaintiff:
Carl Barrett
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC;, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Barrett v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC; et al
as 9:2022cv80515
Plaintiff:
Carl Barrett
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC;, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Smith et al v. Warden et al
as 2:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Osuntoka Smith, Andre D Hansbrough, Toney Davis and others
Defendant:
Warden, D Blackburn, Justin Segerstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Mahaga, et al.
as 2:2020cv01128
Plaintiff:
Carl Barrett
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Inc, Mercy Mahaga, Maheda Gone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv04812
Plaintiff:
Carl Barrett, Eric Marinbach, Michel Polston and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and Apple Value Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrett v. Chapman et al
as 2:2020cv00508
Plaintiff:
Carl Barrett
Defendant:
Utter, John Doe, CO O'Donnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Schrubbe et al
as 2:2014cv01607
Plaintiff:
Carl Barrett
Defendant:
Belinda Schrubbe , D Larson, RN Lyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
