Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wells v. Annucci
as 19-2655
Petitioner / Appellant:
Carl Douglas Wells, 92-A-6745
Respondent / Appellee:
Commissioner Anthony J. Annucci, Commissioner of New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Wells v. New York City Department of Co
as 19-1354
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Department of Correction, Superintendent Glenn, RNDC, Commissioner Joseph Ponte and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carl Douglas Wells
Wells v. Annucci
as 1:2019cv03841
Respondent:
Commissioner Anthony J. Annucci
Petitioner:
Carl Douglas Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Wells v. Annucci
as 9:2019cv00333
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci
Petitioner:
Carl Douglas Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez v. Rikers Island
as 19-383
Defendant / Appellee:
ACLU, American Civil Liberty, Darcel D. Clark, Bronx District Attorney, John Doe, Warden of Riker's Island Slave Complex and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Douglas Wells, Eugene Moore, Terrence D. Williams and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Joaquin Ramirez
Ramirez et al v. Riker's Island Slave Complex et al
as 1:2018cv09260
Defendant:
Lawerance Marks, Michael Pompeo, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Douglas Wells, Eugene Moore, Terrence D. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Presley
as 18-1410
Petitioner - Appellant:
Carl Douglas Wells
Respondent - Appellee:
Warden Ada Presley
Wells v. Lee et al
as 1:2014cv01214
Plaintiff:
Carl Douglas Wells
Defendant:
William Lee, F. Bernstein and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. LeFevre
as 10-3295
Petitioner - Appellant:
Carl Douglas Wells
Respondent - Appellee:
Eugene LeFevre, Superintendent of Franklin Correctional Facility
Wells v. LeFevre
as 1:1996cv03417
Petitioner:
Carl Douglas Wells
Respondent:
Eugene S. LeFevre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
