Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Kennedy v. Jones
as 1:2018cv00357
Respondent:
Carla Jones
Petitioner:
Carlos Edward Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bledsoe v. Jones et al
as 4:2018cv01242
Defendant:
Carla Jones and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Plaintiff:
Morris Leon Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marbury v. Estes et al
as 4:2018cv00925
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Marbury
Defendant:
DeWayne Estes, Cedric Specks, Carla Graham and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Truesdale v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2018cv22286
Plaintiff:
William James Truesdale
Defendant:
State of Florida, Defense Attorney, FDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AULTMAN v. FORD et al
as 1:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAY DENNIS AULTMAN
Defendant:
BENJAMIN FORD, CHRISTINE CROSS, RUSSELL HOLLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stroupe v. Hogue et al
as 5:2016cv01690
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jason Stroupe
Defendant:
Carla Hogue, Lyons and Decatur City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aiken v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2016cv24150
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Aiken
Defendant:
United States Of America, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byron Rainer v. Scott Israel, et al
as 16-16249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON S. RAINER
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT ISRAEL, Sheriff of Broward County Florida and CARLA SLAPPY, a.k.a. Sergeant Slappy
Felton Green v. Denise McGill-Johnston, et al
as 16-11172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELTON BERNARD GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DENISE MCGILL-JOHNSTON, Correctional Probation Specialist, ANDRE THORNTON, Correctional Probation Specialist, JOHN BENNETT, (defacto) founder, Imani Transition Ministries and others
Clark v. Jones et al
as 2:2015cv01515
Petitioner:
Richard Morris Clark
Respondent:
Carla Jones and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
