Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hallin et al v. Michigan City City of et al
as 3:2011cv00338
Plaintiff:
Barrett Brett Hallin, I and Barrett Brett Hallin, II
Defendant:
Michigan City City of , Michigan City Area Schools , Michigan City Area Schools Board of School Trustees and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA, INC. et al v. COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH et al
as 1:2011cv00630
Plaintiff:
CARLA CLEARY, C.N.M, LETITIA CLEMONS, DEJIONA JACKSON and others
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, DIRECTOR OF THE INDIANA STATE BUDGET AGENCY and others
Amicu:
INDIANA GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dixie v. Kay et al
as 1:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Dixie
Defendant:
Carla Kay and Shannon VanRyn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Coleman v. Stefanatos et al
as 1:2010cv00099
Plaintiff:
Reginna Chanee Coleman
Defendant:
Mark Stefanatos, John Kauffman, Jason Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00360
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
