Cases 1 - 10 of 234
Carlisle v. Spring Oaks Capital LLC
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Amanda Carlisle
Defendant:
Spring Oaks Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Monterey Bay Military Housing, LLC et al v. Ambac Assurance Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv09193
Defendant:
Danny Ray, Chetan Marfatia, AMBAC Assurance Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Sill Housing, LLC, Vandenberg Housing LP, Riley Communities LLC and others
Respondent:
U.S. Army and U.S. Air Force
Not Classified By Court:
Malvern Capital
Applicant:
Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Joseph v. Easier Funding, LLC
as 6:2023cv01878
Plaintiff:
Carlisle Joseph
Defendant:
Easier Funding, LLC doing business as 60 Day Credit Repair
Carlisle v. Talaris Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08520
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Talaris Therapeutics, Inc., Francois Nader, Sandip Agarwala and others
United States of America v. Carlisle (Wiltshire)
as 23-6776
Defendant:
DIONDRE CARLISLE, RAKEEM FLOWERS, TYRONE SMITH and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN WILTSHIRE
Carlisle v. Sovos Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02503
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Sovos Brands, Inc., William R. Johnson, Todd R. Lachman and others
O'Neill v. New Relic, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08898
Plaintiff:
James O'Neill
Defendant:
New Relic, Inc., William Staples, Lewis Cirne and others
Carlisle v. PhenomeX Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
PhenomeX Inc., Greg Lucier, Jessica Hopfield and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
