Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Carlisle v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Robin Carlisle
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00826
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00311
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Loomis v. Southwest Licking Community Water and Sewer District et al
as 2:2018cv00309
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Loomis
Defendant:
Southwest Licking Community Water and Sewer District, John Carlisle, Mike Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimm et al v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00422
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Grimm , Melanie I Grimm and KBA News, LLC
Defendant:
Jacob Shaw , Clark County Board of County Commissioners and New Carlisle, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimm et al v. Shaw et al
as 1:2017cv00838
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Grimm , Melanie I Grimm and KBA News, LLC
Defendant:
Jacob Shaw, Clark County Board of County Commissioners and New Carlisle, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
B. et al v. Olentangy Local School District Board of Education et al
as 2:2016cv00837
Plaintiff:
I. B. , B. S. , L. S. and others
Defendant:
Olentangy Local School District Board of Education, Matthew Rausenberg, Mark Raiff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Carlisle v. Bauer et al
as 1:2016cv00259
Plaintiff:
Charlie L. Carlisle, III
Defendant:
William Bauer, Jeremy Eaches, Fiasol Ahmed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
