Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Martinez-Machuca v. USA
as 3:2022cv01372
Petitioner:
Jean Carlos Martinez-Machuca
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01727
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez-Bermudez v. USA
as 3:2020cv01039
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carlos Martinez-Bermudez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01495
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruiz-Jusino v. Sears Roebuck of PR, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Ruiz-Jusino
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck of PR, Inc., Carlos Martinez, Edwin Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01652
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
PPV Connection, Inc. v. Ventura-Candelaria et al
as 3:2008cv01190
Plaintiff:
PPV Connection, Inc.
Defendant:
Zuleika Ventura-Candelaria, John Doe 1, Conjugal Partnership Doe-Ventura and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Velazquez-Rosado v. Martinez-Villamil et al
as 3:2007cv01235
Plaintiff:
Milagros Velazquez-Rosado
Defendant:
Carlos Martinez-Villamil, Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Velazquez-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Potter v. Ledesma et al
as 3:2007cv01060
Plaintiff:
Karl Potter
Defendant:
Hector Ledesma, Carlos Martinez, Harold Sutherland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
