Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Santiago-Tito, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2322
Petitioner:
ELVIS IVAN SANTIAGO-TITO, SMITH JEAMPIER SANTIAGO-QUISPE, JUAN CARLOS SANTIAGO-TITO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Carlos Oliva Canto v. William Barr
as 19-72368
Petitioner:
CARLOS SANTIAGO OLIVA CANTO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
International Markets Live, Inc. et al v. Santiago et al
as 2:2018cv01112
Defendant:
Joe Otis, Joel Santiago, Gregory Perdriel and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Terry and International Markets Live, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santiago v. Shiva's Indian Restaurant et al
as 5:2016cv03757
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Santiago
Defendant:
Shiva's Indian Restaurant, Vivek Chandra, Shyam Choudhary and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Rudy Aguilera, et al v. Prospect Mortgage LLC, et al
as 13-56603
Petitioner - Appellee:
RUDY AGUILERA, RONALD ALPAUGH, FIRAS BILLEH and others
Respondent - Appellant:
PROSPECT MORTGAGE, LLC
Domingo Santiago-Santiago v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-72846
Petitioner:
DOMINGO CARLOS SANTIAGO-SANTIAGO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Rudy Aguilera et al v. Prospect Mortgage LLC
as 2:2013cv05070
Petitioner:
Rudy Aguilera, Ronald Alpaugh, Firas Billeh and others
Respondent:
Prospect Mortgage LLC
Juan Santiago Velasco v. M. Biter
as 12-17171
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS SANTIAGO VELASCO
Respondent - Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden
Celis Orduna et al v. Champion Drywall, Inc. of Nevada et al.,
as 2:2012cv01144
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Arriaga, Luis Arriaga Ugalde, Mario Arriaga Ugalde and others
Defendant:
Champion Drywall, Inc. of Nevada, Paul DiGuiseppi, Ed Golchuk and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Velasco v. Biter
as 1:2011cv01952
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Santiago Velasco
Respondent:
M. D. Biter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
