Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 641
Richard Stein v. G. Whitinger, et al
as 16-2727
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD DEAN STEIN
Defendant - Appellee: G. WHITINGER, Lieutenant, SCOTT SCHOOLEY, Deputy Warden, K. MILLER, Grievance Coordinator and others
Edward Darden, Jr. v. Carmen Palmer
as 16-2669
Petitioner - Appellant: EDWARD DARDEN, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: CARMEN DENISE PALMER, Warden
Joel Carter v. MDOC, et al
as 16-2663
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOEL CARTER
Defendant: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Daniel Heyns, Director, KATHLEEN A. MUTSCHLER, Director, Corrections Mental Health Program, RICK RAYMOND, Western Regional Director, Corrections Mental Health Program and others
Defendant - Appellee: PSYCHOLOGIST CARRIE MCROBERTS, SURJIT DINSA, JENNIFER PIRLOT, Mental Health Unit Chief
Searcy v. Palmer
as 4:2016cv14208
Petitioner: Derrico Devon Searcy
Respondent: Carmen D. Palmer
Lance Taylor v. Carmen Palmer, et al
as 16-2605
Plaintiff - Appellant: LANCE TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee: CARMEN DENISE PALMER, Warden, S. FINCH, Accounting Technician, F. ARTES, Deputy Warden and others
Leo Ambler v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 16-2595
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEO MICHAEL AMBLER
Defendant - Appellee: HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director Michigan Department of Corrections, CARMEN DENISE PALMER, Warden, Warden, GREGORY SKIPPER, Deputy Warden and others
Cruz-Rivera v. Palmer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv13993
Petitioner: Miguel A. Cruz-Rivera
Respondent: Carmen Palmer
Calvin Warsaw v. Carmen Palmer
as 16-2554
Petitioner - Appellant: CALVIN D. WARSAW
Respondent - Appellee: CARMEN DENISE PALMER, Warden
Anthony Young v. Carmen Palmer
as 16-2530
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTHONY YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee: CARMEN DENISE PALMER, Warden
Jerell Johnson v. Carmen Palmer
as 16-2515
Petitioner - Appellant: JERELL CHANEY JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee: CARMEN DENISE PALMER, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?