Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01958
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carnahan v. Fifth Third Bank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv00813
Plaintiff: Kaitlin C. Carnahan
Defendant: Fifth Third Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morin-Carnahan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01733
Plaintiff: Kim Morin-Carnahan
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carnahan v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05465
Defendant: Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff: Jamie Carnahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tucker v. County of Stark et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00140
Plaintiff: Brian Tucker
Defendant: County of Stark, Brian Arnold, Gary Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. City of Kent, Ohio, et al
as 5:2016cv01347
Defendant: City of Kent, Ohio, Kent Ohio Police Department, Michelle A. Lee and others
Plaintiff: Margaret Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carnahan v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01389
Plaintiff: Donald Carnahan
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carnahan v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00140
Plaintiff: James A. Carnahan
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carnahan v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21519
Plaintiff: Kathleen H. Carnahan
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carnahan v. McClure et al
as 3:2012cv00775
Plaintiff: Mark Carnahan
Defendant: Mitch McClure , Alex Naton , Steven Waldron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?