Cases 11 - 20 of 41
CARR v. SESSIONS
as 1:2018cv00356
Plaintiff:
JERRY L. CARR
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EMRIT v. PAI et al
as 1:2017cv02849
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
AJIT PAI, MIGNON CLYBURN, MICHAEL O'RIELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLUMENTHAL et al v. TRUMP
as 1:2017cv01154
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, BRIAN SCHATZ and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Amicus Curiae:
HAROLD H. BRUFF, PETER SMITH, BOB CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LAVERGNE et al v. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES et al
as 1:2017cv00793
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MARTIN LAVERGNE, FREDERICK JOHN LAVERGNE, LEONARD P. MARSHALL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PAUL RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
JIGGETTS et al v. CIPULLO et al
as 1:2017cv00380
Plaintiff:
KAREN W. COOPER and TENISHA N. JIGGETTS
Defendant:
DANIEL W. CIPULLO, RICHARD PARRIS, ANNE B. WICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARR v. USA
as 1:2016cv01292
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
BRIAN ERIC CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC, et al v. INTERNATIONAL COURT OF COMMERCE
as 1:2016cv00723
Plaintiff:
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC , DAVID ERTEL , BRIAN BOMSTEIN and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF COMMERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARR v. STEPHENS et al
as 1:2015mc00131
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND E. CARR
Defendant:
WILLIAMS STEPHENS, CHARLES A. MOELAND, RICK PERRY and others
Cause Of Action: Complaint
RIVERA v. SARIS et al
as 1:2014cv01092
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL A. RIVERA
Defendant:
PATTI B. SARIS, WILLIAM B. CARR, JR., RICARDO H. HINOJOSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
