Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Ramminger v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2013cv02608
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper , James Davis , Scott Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley W. Ramminger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carr v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv01951
Petitioner:
Christopher Carr
Respondent:
Mike Miller and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv01950
Petitioner:
Christopher Carr
Respondent:
Mike Miller and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DirectTv, LLC, v. Carr et al
as 1:2013cv01364
Plaintiff:
DirectTv, LLC
Defendant:
Daniela Carr, Nello's Inc. and Daniela (I) Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Labor
Bachhuber et al v. City and County of Denver
as 1:2012cv02582
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Bachhuber and Michael Carr
Defendant:
City and County of Denver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Perinn, v. City of Commerce City, State of Colorado, et al.,
as 1:2012cv01172
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Perinn
Defendant:
City of Commerce City, State of Colorado, Phillip (I) Baca, Phillip Baca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Benedict et al
as 1:2012cv00317
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Carr
Defendant:
Diane Benedict and Veronique Van Pelt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00229
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Objector:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 0110
Carr et al v. US Bank North America et al
as 1:2011cv03377
Plaintiff:
Dwight A. Carr and Deborah A. Stevens-Carr
Defendant:
US Bank North America, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Vaden Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Carr v. Jones et al
as 1:2011cv03053
Plaintiff:
Reginald S. Carr
Defendant:
Susan Jones and Bunker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
