Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carrick v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv04233
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle E Carrick
Defendant:
Peloton Interactive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Carrick v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv03838
Plaintiff:
Claire Carrick
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Carrick v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv06646
Plaintiff:
Ivy Carrick
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Mitchell v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2020cv00831
Plaintiff:
Mia Rose Mitchell and Mia Rosati
Defendant:
Joseph Bick, Ralph M. Diaz, Jeffrey Carrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2020at00401
Plaintiff:
Mia Rose Mitchell and Mia Rosati
Defendant:
Joseph Bick, Ralph M. Diaz, Jeffrey Carrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Landreth v. Lehil et al
as 2:2020cv00472
Defendant:
Thao Nguyen, Jonovan Ottenbacher, Jeffrey Carrick and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Landreth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Garcia v. Carrick
as 2:2019cv00643
Defendant:
Jeffrey Carrick
Plaintiff:
Manual Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Concepcion v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2018cv01743
Plaintiff:
Michelle Concepcion
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, California Correctional Health Care Services, Clark J. Kelso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Brown et al
as 2:2018cv00766
Plaintiff:
Lamar McQueen
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jeffrey Carrick, Medical Executive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
