Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Kight v. Carroll County Jail
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Camaron Kight
Defendant:
Carroll County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kight v. Carroll County Jail
as 1:2023cv02003
Plaintiff:
Camaron Kight
Defendant:
Carroll County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glenn v. DFCS- Carroll County
as 3:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Constance Glenn
Defendant:
DFCS- Carroll County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shelton v. Carroll County Jail
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Aaron Tajuan Shelton
Defendant:
Carroll County Jail and Pier Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Langley et al
as 3:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Harris
Defendant:
Terry Langley, Carroll County, Lt Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Langley
as 3:2022cv00188
Petitioner:
Charles Harris
Respondent:
Sheriff Terry Langley, LT Henderson, Carroll County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patrick Roether, et al v. State of Georgia, et al
as 22-13731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK ROETHER and HOLLIE ROETHER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF TENNESSEE, COUNTY OF MCINTOSH and others
Shelton v. Carroll County Jail
as 3:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Aaron Shelton
Defendant:
Carroll County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tilman v. Langley
as 3:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Davoric Tilman
Defendant:
Carroll County Jail
Respondent:
Terry Langley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bridges v. Carroll County, Georgia et al
as 3:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Tahji A.D. Bridges
Defendant:
Carroll County, Georgia, Sheriff Terry Langley and Valerie Cooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
