Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Bell v. Write et al
as 0:2022cv04324
Plaintiff:
Casey Bell
Defendant:
Sherriff Chuck Write, Capt. Hayse, Sgnt. Pilgrim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Davis v. Richland County et al
as 3:2020cv03799
Defendant:
Kyle Oliver, Richland County, John Doe Deputies and others
Plaintiff:
Cierra Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roach et al v. White et al
as 7:2020cv03601
Defendant:
Office of the Union County Sheriff, Samuel W White, Union County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Emily K Harkins and Casey A Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Young et al
as 3:2019cv03312
Defendant:
Patrick Wright, Ken Young, Jr., Casey Dale Cornwell and others
Plaintiff:
Latorey J. Greene, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Young et al
as 3:2019cv02175
Plaintiff:
Latorey Greene and Latorey J. Greene
Defendant:
Patrick Wright, Ken Young, Casey Dale Cornwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Lexington County Court of General Sessions et al
as 3:2019cv01898
Defendant:
Casey Rankin-Smith and Lexington County Court of General Sessions
Plaintiff:
Hayward L Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuckey v. State of South Carolina, The
as 0:2019cv01498
Respondent:
State of South Carolina, The
Petitioner:
Casey Stuckey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Fifth Judicial Circuit et al
as 3:2019cv00907
Plaintiff:
Maceo Sandy Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
L. Casey Manning, Fifth Judicial Circuit and G. Thomas Cooper, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Rankin et al
as 3:2018cv02905
Defendant:
Casey N Rankin, State of South Carolina and Alan M Wilson
Plaintiff:
Hayward L Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Cohen
as 2:2018cv02067
Petitioner:
Casey Lewis
Respondent:
LeVern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
