Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Crayton v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2021cv01730
Defendant:
No Named Defendants and Canon City Police Department
Plaintiff:
Cassie Crayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crow v. Colorado Time Comp et al
as 1:2021cv01417
Defendant:
Lopez, Procter, Florez and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley E. Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wind v. United States Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01113
Defendant:
Kate Knowles, Matthew Newcomer, James McKenzie and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Carl Wind, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Twiford v. Correctional Health Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv03587
Defendant:
Steven Dawson, Wellington Duplessis, Monika Lovric and others
Plaintiff:
Rainer James Twiford Jr. and James Rainer Twiford, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Correctional Health Partners et al
as 1:2019cv03586
Defendant:
Kirk M Taylor, Steven Dawson, Physician Health Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Hatch et al
as 1:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
Rudy Chavez
Defendant:
Timothy Hatch, Mathew Montoya, Cassie Harbour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Himes v. Enid Police Department, et al
as 16-6244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDREY ALLEN HIMES
Defendant - Appellee:
ENID POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROBERTO NORTON, Officer, KEVIN EVERLEY, Officer and others
Himes v. Enid Police Department et al
as 5:2015cv01117
Plaintiff:
Audrey Allen Himes
Defendant:
Enid Police Department, Kevin Everly, Cassie Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Himes v. Enid Police Department et al
as 5:2015cv01084
Plaintiff:
Audrey Allen Himes
Defendant:
Enid Police Department, Roberto Norton, Kevin Everley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maloch v. MJ Store et al
as 2:2012cv00830
Plaintiff:
Timothy Michael Maloch
Defendant:
MJ Store, Julie Nguyen, FNU Lowther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
