Cases 1 - 10 of 960
(PC) Crain v. State of California et al
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Gary Crain
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch et al v. State of CA, et al
as 2:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
David Couch, Sr. and Jeanelle Couch
Defendant:
State of California, California Highway Patrol, Ryan Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(HC) Sanchez v. Cates
as 1:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Alejandro Sanchez
Defendant:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Couch et al v. Patrol et al
as 2:2024at00155
Plaintiff:
David Couch, Sr. and Jeanelle Couch
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol, State of California, Ryan Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
(HC) Sanchez v. Cates
as 2:2024cv00323
Petitioner:
Alejandro Sanchez
Defendant:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Sanchez v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv01706
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Sanchez
Defendant:
Warden, B. Cates, Officer Murro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Amesquita v. Macomber et al
as 1:2023cv01604
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Amesquita
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Brian Cates, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Horsley v. Cates
as 1:2023cv01248
Petitioner:
Allen Ray Horsley
Respondent:
Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Jimenez v. Cates
as 1:2023cv01376
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Jimenez
Defendant:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horsley v. Cates
as 1:2023at00708
Petitioner:
Allen Ray Horsley
Defendant:
Acting Warden Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
