Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith v. Cackler et al
as 4:2022cv00088
Defendant:
Lincoln Financial Group, Josie Cackler, Shelby Cates and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Griffith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cates v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00136
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Charles Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bass et al v. Tour 18 at Rose Creek LP
as 5:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Andy Bass , Jeffrey R Atkins , LaDonna L Atkins and others
Defendant:
Tour 18 at Rose Creek LP
Counter_claimant:
Tour 18 at Rose Creek LP
Counter_defendant:
Gaylan Adams , Jeffrey R Atkins , LaDonna L Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cates v. Dallas Veterans Hospital
as 6:2016cv00402
Plaintiff:
Sandra Cates
Defendant:
Dallas Veterans Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Red Coyote LLC v. Red Fox Wireless Inc et al
as 5:2015cv00142
Plaintiff:
Red Coyote LLC
Defendant:
Red Fox Wireless Inc and Josh Cates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Olivera v. Cate et al
as 5:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
Angel Olivera
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Scott Kernan, Terri McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
