Cases 31 - 40 of 222
Masao Kikuchi v. Catherine Bauman
as 20-1593
Respondent / Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
MASAO KIKUCHI
Rufus Spearman v. MI, et al
as 20-1476
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS G. FINCO, ROBERT NAPEL, Warden, SHANE PLACE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN
Johnny Tippins v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 20-1480
Defendant / Appellee:
K. CHAMBERLIN, Prison Counselor, ANTHONY IMMEL, Deputy Warden, G. SCHEAM, Resident Unit Manager and others
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director and CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY TIPPINS
Travis Longmire v. MDOC, et al
as 20-1389
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager, CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS SANTELL LONGMIRE
Rumpf #978443 v. Bauman
as 1:2020cv00368
Petitioner:
Sigmund Rumpf and Sigmund Rumpf #978443
Defendant:
Catherine S. Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00302
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
James Butler v. Connie Horton
as 20-1239
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES BUTLER
Respondent / Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden and CONNIE HORTON, Warden
Brenitaze Moore v. Catherine Bauman
as 20-1115
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRENITAZE MOORE
Respondent / Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, named as Catherine Bauman
Christopher Howard v. Catherine Bauman, et al
as 20-1099
Defendant / Appellee:
J. NAEYAERT, RUM /SCC Member, P. HUBBLE, Prison Counselor / Dog Program Supervisor, BENNY MERCIER, Assistant Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HOWARD
Travis Longmire v. Catherine Bauman
as 20-1092
Respondent / Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRAVIS SANTELL LONGMIRE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
