Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Joel Carter v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of Michigan Department of Corrections, DAVID DAWDY, Director of Corrections Mental Health Program, BILL VETTE, Mental Health Rights Specialist of Corrections Mental Health Program and others
Richard Clark v. Cathleen Stoddard
as 17-1179
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD LEE CLARK
Respondent - Appellee:
CATHLEEN STODDARD, Warden
Lewis #659963 v. Stoddard et al
as 1:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Tony Doirelle Lewis #659963
Defendant:
Cathleen Stoddard, Unknown Fenby, C. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Hayes Bacall v. Cathleen Stoddard
as 16-2668
Petitioner - Appellant:
HAYES BACALL
Respondent - Appellee:
CATHLEEN STODDARD
Robert Sango v. Robert Ault, et al
as 16-1488
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT D. SANGO
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT AULT, Assistant Residential Unit Supervisor, JAMES TESTER, Correctional Officer, BRANDON SCHAFER, Correctional Officer and others
Richard Clark v. Cathleen Stoddard
as 16-1446
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD LEE CLARK
Respondent - Appellee:
CATHLEEN STODDARD, Warden
Joseph Dunbar v. John Prelesnik, et al
as 16-1374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH GREGORY DUNBAR
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PRELESNIK, Warden, CATHLEEN STODDARD, acting warden and DANIEL H. HEYNS, .
Terrance Pugh v. Jennifer Gehuski, et al
as 15-2571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRANCE PUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNIFER GEHUSKI, ARUS, JIM DUNIGAN, RUM, ALAN HESSBROOK, ARUS and others
Leonard Bradford-Bey v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 15-1521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD BRADFORD-BEY, named as Lenard Bradford-Bey, [Moorish Science Temple of America, Inc. Reincarnate Temple of Detroit (MSTAR)] Acting on Behalf of The Class Of Washitaw Muurs Institutionalized Within The Michigan Department Of Corrections Practicing
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, MICHAEL MARTIN, ROBERT WILCOXSON-BEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
