Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Moss v. Catholic Charities, USA et al
as 1:2016cv00839
Plaintiff:
Kyra Moss
Defendant:
Catholic Charities, USA and Sister Donna Markham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Flynn v. Cohison et al
as 1:2016cv02243
Defendant:
Catholic Charities, Robyn Cohison and Miss Pegis
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah G. Flynn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv06059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter Center v. Catholic Charities
as 5:2015cv00597
Plaintiff:
Larry Carter Center
Defendant:
Catholic Charities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv08051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Saldana v. Catholic Charities Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv08898
Plaintiff:
Alexander Saldana
Defendant:
Catholic Charities Corp., Orange County Department of Social Services, Berkshire Farms Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roa v. Catholic Charities Neighborhood Services, Inc.
as 1:2013cv05433
Defendant:
Catholic Charities Neighborhood Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rafael Rodriguez Roa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04971
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tavares v. Catholic Charities Brooklyn and Queens, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03364
Defendant:
Patricia Bowles, Catholic Charities Brooklyn and Queens, Inc., Catholic Charities Neighborhood Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bereni Tavares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
