Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BANNER HEALTH et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv00962
Plaintiff:
BANNER HEALTH doing business as BANNER-UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER TUCSON CAMPUS, BILLINGS CLINIC, CAYUGA MEDICAL CENTER AT ITHACA and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Murphy v. Cayuga Medical Center
as 17-837
Petitioner - Appellee:
Paul J. Murphy, Regional Director of the Third Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent - Appellant:
Cayuga Medical Center, of Ithaca
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Murphy v. Cayuga Medical Center at Ithaca, Inc.
as 3:2017mc00004
Petitioner:
Paul J. Murphy
Respondent:
Cayuga Medical Center at Ithaca, Inc.
Jacobsen v. Dhundale et al
as 5:2016cv00056
Plaintiff:
Margo Jacobsen
Defendant:
Melissa Dhundale , Cornell University , Daniel Sudilovsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jacobsen v. Dhundale et al
as 1:2015cv06677
Plaintiff:
Margo Jacobsen
Defendant:
Melissa Dhundale, Cornell University, Daniel Sudilovsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Easter v. Cayuga Medical Center at Ithaca Prepaid Health Plan et al
as 5:2014cv01403
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Easter
Defendant:
Cayuga Medical Center at Ithaca Prepaid Health Plan , Cayuga Medical Center at Ithaca and Excellus Bluecross Blueshield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Carmel v. CSH&C et al
as 6:2014cv06385
Plaintiff:
Wanda J Carmel
Defendant:
CSH&C, VAMC, St. Joseph's Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gibson v. Hwang et al
as 5:2011cv01241
Plaintiff:
Tracy Gibson
Defendant:
Kim Hwang and Cayuga Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
