Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Griffin Greenhouse Supplies, Inc. v. Jennings, III
as 3:2023cv00082
Defendant:
P. Cecil Jennings, III and Phillip Jennings, III
Plaintiff:
Griffin Greenhouse Supplies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Grant v. Brown
as 1:2023cv02621
Plaintiff:
Cecil Grant
Defendant:
Terry Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
TALLEY v. CITY OF LAGRANGE GEORGIA et al
as 4:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar Talley
Defendant:
City of LaGrange, GA, Barbara Price, Roy Olinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cecil & Campbell Advisors, LLC v. Young et al
as 1:2023cv00637
Counter Defendant:
Cecil & Campbell Advisors, LLC, Anthony K. Cecil, II and James C. Campbell
Defendant:
Jared Young, NYJ Holdings, LLC and Canopy Real Estate Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Violation of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02649
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
