Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Celanese Corporation v. Clariant Corporation et al
as 2:2016mc00091
Plaintiff:
Celanese Corporation
Defendant:
Clariant Corporation and Clariant AG.
Celanese Corporation v. Clariant Corporation et al
as 3:2016mc00015
Plaintiff:
Celanese Corporation
Defendant:
Clariant Corporation and Clariant AG
Movant:
HDI Global Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Celanese Corporation v. Clariant Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv01304
Plaintiff:
Celanese Corporation
Defendant:
Clariant Corporation and Clariant AG
Movant:
HDI Global Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Easler v. Hoechst Celanese Corporation et al
as 7:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jay Easler
Defendant:
Hoechst Celanese Corporation , HNA Holdings Inc , CNA Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Consolidation Coal Company v. 3M Company, et al.
as 5:2009cv00191
Defendant:
Central Regional Hospital, Conopco, Inc. d/b/a Unilever formerly known as Lever Bros. doing business as Unilever, Consumers Energy Company and others
Plaintiff:
Consolidation Coal Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Gulf Metals Industries, Inc. et al v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 4:2008cv00672
Defendant:
Amoco Oil Company, Beazer East Inc, Tenneco Resins Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gulf Metals Industries, Inc. and Cooper Industries, L.L.C.
Cross Defendant:
Royal Dutch Shell, Lyondell Refining I LLC, Lyondell Refining Co and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
DIAMOND CHEMICAL CO. v. ATOFINA CHEMICALS, et al
as 1:2002cv01018
Plaintiff:
DIAMOND CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC
Defendant:
ATOFINA CHEMICALS, INC., ELF ATOCHEM S.A., ATOFINA S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Arteva Speclty, et al v. EPA
as 96-1422
Terminated Party:
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Petitioner:
Arteva Specialties S.a.r.l., doing business as KoSa
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
