Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Piney Woods ER III LLC dba Excel ER v. Centene Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00261
Defendant:
Celtic Insurance Company dba Arkansas Health & Wellnes Insurance Company and Centene Corporation
Plaintiff:
Piney Woods ER III LLC dba Excel ER
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01014
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00457
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00266
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Martinez et al v. Superior HealthPlan, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00870
Plaintiff:
Martinez, Eugene Martinez, David Silva and others
Defendant:
Superior HealthPlan, Inc, Centene Corporation and Superior HealthPlan, Inc.
Petitioner:
David Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00380
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00417
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Keats v. American Republic Insurance Company et al
as 4:2012cv01323
Plaintiff:
Donna Keats
Defendant:
American Republic Insurance Company , World Insurance Company , American Enterprise Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Clark et al v. Centene Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00174
Defendant:
Centene Company of Texas, L.P., Centene Corporation and Superior HealthPlan, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kathy Clark, Amy Endsley, Susan Grimmett and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
