Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 28
CENTIMARK CORPORATION v. BAUER et al
as 2:2017cv01149
Plaintiff: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER BAUER and DDP ROOFING SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
CENTIMARK CORPORATION v. ROCHESTER WIRE AND CABLE, LLC
as 2:2017cv00470
Plaintiff: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Defendant: ROCHESTER WIRE AND CABLE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE GORILLA GLUE COMPANY v. CENTIMARK CORPORATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00261
Plaintiff: THE GORILLA GLUE COMPANY
Defendant: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CENTIMARK CORPORATION v. TIMBER RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
as 2:2016cv01769
Plaintiff: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Defendant: TIMBER RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00136
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LEI AG - EMBASSY ROW, LLC v. CENTIMARK CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv04100
Defendant: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Plaintiff: LEI AG - EMBASSY ROW, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACOBSEN v. CENTIMARK CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv01270
Plaintiff: JON A. JACOBSEN
Defendant: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CENTIMARK CORPORATION v. JACOBSEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv01137
Plaintiff: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Defendant: JON A. JACOBSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CENTIMARK CORPORATION v. LAVINE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00757
Plaintiff: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Defendant: DONALD LAVINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. CENTIMARK CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv01659
Plaintiff: LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY and WINDWARD PETROLEUM PARTNERS INC
Defendant: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?