Cases 41 - 50 of 56
GARNER vs CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, et al
as 5:2017cv00130
Plaintiff:
VALENCIA RENA GARNER
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARTA BREEZE TRANSPORTATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARNER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 5:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
VALENCIA GARNER
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, MARTA BREEZE TRANSPORTATION, WANDA DUNHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARNER v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY et al
as 5:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
VALENCIA GARNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, MARTA POLICE, FEDERAL TRANSIT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARNER v. LYNCH et al
as 5:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
VALENCIA RENA GARNER
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH, JOHN HORN, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garner v. Horn et al
as 1:2016mi00094
Plaintiff:
Valencia Garner
Defendant:
John Horn, Central Intelligence Agency, George Crouch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gary v. Obama et al
as 1:2016cv00078
Plaintiff:
Cathleen R. Gary
Defendant:
United States Government, Barack Obama, National Security Agency/Central Security Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 7:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 1:2015cv02065
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 4:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
