Cases 1 - 10 of 29
IN RE: JOSEPH EUGENE MANDER III
as 2:2024cv00773
Not Yet Classified:
JOSEPH EUGENE MANDER, III
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Erick Pringle, et al
as 22-1993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
In re: ERICK PRINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
ELON MUSK, AMAZON INC, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Defendant:
BELLEVUE HOSPITAL NEW YORK, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANDREW CUOMO and others
SLEETS v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2021cv04182
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILLIAM SLEETS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY, US ARMY CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION COMMAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HECKER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2021cv02701
Defendant:
SEARGENT WHARTON, JIMMY KIMMEL, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R HECKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2019cv00303
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MIKE POMPEO and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Frederick Banks v. Soo Song, et al
as 17-2791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOO C. SONG, J. ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Frederick Banks v. Adrian Roe, et al
as 17-2789
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIAN N. ROE, Esq., MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT S. CESSAR and others
Frederick Banks v. Adrian Roe, et al
as 17-2787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIAN N. ROE, Esq., MARK R. HORNAK, J. ROBERT CESSAR and others
Frederick Banks v. Adrian Roe, et al
as 17-2793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIAN N. ROE, Esq., MARK R. HORNAK, J. ROBERT CESSAR and others
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00672
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
