Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Lexon Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund
Garnishee:
Lexon Insurance Company
Defendant:
A.J. Walker Construction Company
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. NOLA Delivery, Inc.
as 2:2012mc00396
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant:
NOLA Delivery, Inc.
Garnishee:
Capital One Bank
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Chapa et al
as 5:2011mc00754
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant:
Clementina M. Chapa and Becky C. Garcia
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Matthews
as 3:2011mc00087
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant:
Wanda Matthews
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Ratliff et al
as 2:2008mc04430
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant:
James L. Ratliff, M. J. Ratliff and Ratliff Family Living Trust
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Centex Pipeline Construction Inc
as 6:2007mc00015
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Central States, Southeast and Souwthwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Centex Pipeline Construction Inc
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. The Schaper Co. of Illinois et al
as 3:2007mc00016
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant:
The Schaper Co. of Illinois, The Schaper Co., Lighthouse Foods, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
